Posts

FOREX TRADING IN NIGERIA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF SEC PROPOSED RULES ON ONLINE FOREX TRADING FOR TECHNOLOGY AND PLATFORM PROVIDERS

/0 Comments/in , /by

BY SEUN TIMI-KOLEOLU & PROMISE ITAH

Introduction

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has proposed rules on Online Forex Trading and Contracts for Difference (“CFDs”) (the “Proposed Rules”), introducing a regulatory framework for businesses involved in the provision of online Forex and CFD trading services in Nigeria.

The Proposed Rules will affect not only Forex brokers and CFD providers, but also the companies that provide the technology they use. This includes companies that provide the websites and apps where users open trading accounts; check currency and asset prices; place trades; and manage their investments. It may also include companies that host these platforms or provide the technology and systems that allow them to operate.

In this newsletter, we highlight key provisions of the Proposed Rules relevant to businesses that provide technology or platforms for online Forex and CFD trading.

What are Online Forex Trading and CFDS?

Under the Proposed Rules, Forex/FX/Foreign Exchange means the exchange of one national currency for another. Online forex trading involves trading foreign currencies through an online platform.

A Contract for Difference (CFD) is a derivative that allows a person to trade based on changes in the price of an underlying asset without owning the asset.

Key Highlights of the Proposed Rules

  1. Technology and Platform Providers Within the Regulatory Framework

Under the Proposed Rules, technology and platform providers are recognised as a distinct category of regulated persons. This category appears broad enough to cover businesses that provide trading infrastructure, software, platforms, systems or other technology used in connection with online Forex and CFD trading.

The Proposed Rules also apply to offshore businesses that target or provide services to Nigerian residents. This may arise where a platform permits Nigerian residents to open accounts, advertises its services to Nigerians, uses Nigerian currency or references, engages Nigerian influencers or affiliates, or otherwise demonstrates an intention to serve the Nigerian market.

Accordingly, a technology provider may need to assess its activities carefully where its platform is used by a Forex broker or CFD operator serving Nigerian residents. The fact that the provider does not deal directly with clients or execute trades may not, by itself, take it outside the scope of the Proposed Rules.

  1. Registration and Capital Requirements

A person may not carry on, or hold itself out as carrying on, the business of a technology or platform provider within the scope of the Proposed Rules without registration with the SEC.

For technology and platform providers, the Proposed Rules contemplate a minimum paid-up capital of ₦5 billion. The provider must also be incorporated in Nigeria or be a foreign company with an appropriate local presence in Nigeria.

The proposed registration fees comprise:

  • Application fee – ₦100,000;
  • Processing fee – ₦300,000; and
  • Registration fee for a Category C technology or platform provider – ₦30 million.

In addition, a registered provider would be required to maintain professional indemnity insurance of not less than 20% of the applicable minimum capital per claim, or provide an equivalent security acceptable to the SEC.

  1. Operational and Technology Standards

The Proposed Rules place significant emphasis on the reliability, security and resilience of trading platforms. Technology providers would be expected to maintain systems that support the continuous and orderly operation of trading activities. The key requirements include:

  • Platform availability: Platforms must maintain a minimum uptime of 99.5% during trading hours.
  • Cybersecurity: Providers must have appropriate security measures in place, including end-to-end encryption of client and trade data, multi-factor authentication, regular penetration testing, and systems for monitoring and responding to security threats.
  • Business continuity and disaster recovery: Providers must maintain business continuity and disaster recovery arrangements, test these arrangements annually and submit the relevant certification to the SEC.
  • Record-keeping: Providers must retain audit trails of transactions and other relevant activities for at least seven years. Records must be readily retrievable within 24 hours and may include client information, orders, transactions, confirmations, electronic communications, financial records, AML records and risk disclosures.

These requirements may have implications for the design and operation of trading platforms and should be considered in the contractual arrangements between technology providers and the brokers or other regulated entities using their systems.

  1. Data Protection and Data Localisation

The Proposed Rules also set requirements for the storage and protection of client and trading data. Client order data must be stored in Nigeria or another jurisdiction approved by the SEC, in line with applicable data protection requirements. Technology providers may therefore need to review their data hosting arrangements, third-party access and cross-border data transfers.

  1. White-Label Platforms and Outsourced Technology

The Proposed Rules are also relevant to businesses that provide white-label platforms or outsourced technology solutions. Where a provider supplies the infrastructure used by a broker or trading operator, the parties will need to consider how responsibility for regulatory compliance is allocated. This should include responsibility for:

  • platform availability and performance;
  • cybersecurity and access controls;
  • data storage and processing;
  • incident reporting;
  • recordkeeping and audit trails;
  • business continuity and disaster recovery;
  • regulatory inspections and information requests;
  • use of subcontractors and external technology providers; and
  • suspension, termination or migration of the platform.

The Proposed Rules require prior SEC approval for certain material changes, including changes to a trading platform or technology provider. This means that brokers and other regulated entities may need to obtain SEC approval before changing their technology providers or making significant changes to their trading platform.

Technology agreements should therefore be reviewed to ensure that they contain appropriate provisions dealing with regulatory cooperation, audit rights, service levels, incident escalation, data access, business continuity and orderly transition.

  1. Incident Reporting and Regulatory Cooperation

A technology provider would be required to notify the SEC within 24 hours of a material system breach, outage or cybersecurity incident.

This requirement creates a need for clear internal escalation procedures and contractual reporting arrangements. A broker may not become aware of a system incident immediately, while a technology provider may not have sufficient information to determine whether an incident is material from a regulatory perspective.

Technology providers and their regulated clients should therefore agree in advance on:

  • What constitutes a reportable incident;
  • How quickly incidents must be escalated;
  • Who is responsible for notifying the SEC;
  • The information to be included in an incident report;
  • How affected clients will be notified; and
  • The steps required to contain, investigate and remedy the incident.

The Proposed Rules also contemplate independent systems audits and penetration testing reports for proprietary and white-labelled platforms. Providers should expect increased scrutiny of their technology architecture, security controls, access management, development processes and third-party dependencies.

  1. What Technology Providers Should Consider

Businesses providing technology or platform services to online Forex and CFD operators should begin reviewing their current operations against the proposed framework. In particular, they should:

  • assess their regulatory classification and determine whether their services fall within the proposed definition of a technology or platform provider;
  • review their Nigerian market exposure, including whether their platforms are accessible to Nigerian residents or marketed through Nigerian brokers, affiliates, influencers or other intermediaries;
  • evaluate their capital and local presence requirements, particularly where they operate through a foreign company or provide services on a white-label basis;
  • review their technology infrastructure, including uptime, encryption, authentication, monitoring, penetration testing and incident response arrangements;
  • assess their data arrangements, including data hosting locations, backups, cross-border transfers, subcontractors and compliance with applicable data protection laws;
  • update their contractual arrangements with brokers and other regulated entities to address service levels, audit rights, incident reporting, regulatory access, business continuity and liability;
  • prepare for enhanced recordkeeping and audit requirements, including the retention and retrieval of client, transaction and system records for at least seven years.

Conclusion

The SEC’s Proposed Rules signal closer regulation of online Forex and CFD trading in Nigeria, including the technology infrastructure supporting such activities. While the provisions highlighted in this newsletter are not exhaustive, the proposed requirements may have significant implications for both local and foreign businesses operating in this space.

Businesses should therefore review their regulatory position and relevant operations ahead of the final rules. As the proposals remain subject to change, businesses should continue to monitor developments and assess any implications based on the nature of their services and Nigerian market exposure.

NIGERIA’S PROPOSED RULES ON DIGITAL AND VIRTUAL ASSETS: KEY PROVISIONS AND IMPLICATION FOR BUSINESSES

/0 Comments/in , /by

BY SEUN TIMI-KOLEOLU & HILLARY OKOROTIE

Introduction 

On August 20, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) published the Proposed Rules on Digital and Virtual Assets Operations, Custody and Markets (the “Proposed Rules”). The Proposed Rules seek to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital and virtual asset activities in Nigeria, including the issuance, offering, trading, custody, transfer and settlement of digital and virtual assets. 

The Proposed Rules set out: the categories of activities to which they apply; the prescribed requirements for conducting business in relation to digital and virtual assets; and regulatory requirements relating to the issuance and trading of digital assets. 

In this newsletter, we provide an overview of the key provisions of the Proposed Rules and their potential implication for businesses operating within Nigeria’s digital and virtual asset ecosystem. 

Key Provisions and Implication of the Proposed Rules 

Where the proposed rules are implemented the following are key provisions that players in the digital and  virtual assets space should take note of when operating in the Nigerian market. 

1. Application of the Proposed Rules 

The Proposed Rules will apply to persons and businesses operating in Nigeria, as well as persons providing services to Nigerian residents or the Nigerian market through digital channels in relation with the issuance, trading, custody and management of digital and virtual assets. 

The Proposed Rules will also apply to persons and entities facilitating any aspect of digital and virtual asset services, including Virtual Asset Service Providers (“VASPs”) and Digital Asset Custodians(“DAO”). 

2. Obligations of Regulated Entities 

Regulated entities are required to comply with various obligations in the conduct of their business and in the issuance, offering, and trading of digital assets in Nigeria. These obligations include, amongst others, the following: 

  1. Advertisement and Promotion: In connection with the issuance and offering of digital assets in Nigeria, entities must ensure that no publication, advertisement, or promotional material is made in respect of a digital asset unless the asset has been duly registered with SEC. Where an entity advertises or promotes a registered digital asset, such advertisement or promotional content must be accurate, fair, and not misleading.
  2. Changes to the Structure of the Entity: Where there are material changes to the structure or operations of a regulated entity, including changes to its ownership, governance structure, technology architecture, or business model, the entity must obtain SEC’s prior approval before implementing such changes. In addition, any cybersecurity incident, data loss, or loss of assets must be reported to SEC within twenty-four hours of such occurrence.
  3. Dispute and Conflict of Interest Management: Entities engaged in the trading of digital assets must maintain a comprehensive framework for receiving, handling, and resolving customer complaints. They are also required to establish and maintain appropriate procedures for identifying, managing, and mitigating conflicts of interest arising in connection with their digital asset trading activities.
  4. System Access and Transaction Monitoring: SEC may require regulated entities to provide API-based access to their financial, operational, and transaction data for regulatory monitoring and supervisory purposes. The Proposed Rules further require entities to implement systems capable of monitoring and reporting transactions involving Nigerian residents. In respect of cross-border transactions, entities must implement systems that maintain designated transaction wallets for domestic and cross-border asset flows. Such systems must also ensure that all inflows into and outflows from Nigeria are traceable to identifiable users.

3. Disclosure Requirements for the Issuance of Digital Assets 

The Proposed Rules require the disclosure of all material information relating to a digital asset prior to its issuance. An issuing entity is required to prepare a white paper containing the issuers information, characteristics, offer structure of the digital asset, and other material information to enable prospective investors make informed investment decisions. The whitepaper must be filed with SEC, and the issuing entity must obtain a no-objection or approval from SEC before offering the digital asset to the public. 

The issuing entity and its officers will be responsible for any misrepresentation or omission of material information contained in the whitepaper. Where there is a material change to the information relating to the digital asset following SEC’s no-objection or approval, the issuing entity will be required to file a supplementary or amended whitepaper with SEC and suspend further issuance of the digital asset pending compliance with the applicable requirements. 

4. Issuance of the Digital Assets 

The Proposed Rules provide that, for an asset to be eligible for issuance, the rights and obligations attached to the asset must be clear, the structure of the asset must be transparent, and the risks must be adequately disclosed. 

Digital assets shall be categorized either as Asset-Referenced Tokens, Asset-Backed Tokens, or other digital assets, including cryptocurrencies and utility tokens. Assets that are anonymous, exhibit a fraudulent token structure, or constitute an unbacked stablecoin will be prohibited from issuance. The asset must also be offered through a Digital Asset Offering Platform approved by SEC. 

5. Registration Under the Proposed Rules 

An entity intending to register under the Proposed Rules must apply to first participate in SEC’s Accelerated Regulatory Incubation Programme (“ARIP”). Following an application under the ARIP, SEC may grant the applicant an Approval-in-Principle to commence operations subject to the conditions prescribed by SEC. The Approval-in-Principle will be valid for a period of two years, after which SEC may require the entity to apply for full registration. 

SEC may, in certain circumstances, permit an applicant to bypass the ARIP process. This may apply where the applicant is a registered capital market operator, a registered (“VASP”), or a subsidiary of a licensed financial institution. 

To qualify for registration under the Proposed Rules, an entity must, amongst  other requirements, be incorporated in Nigeria in accordance with the Companies and Allied Matters Act, 2020. Its Chief Executive Officer and other principal officers must be resident in Nigeria, and the entity must maintain a registered office address in Nigeria. The applicant must also satisfy other registration and regulatory requirements prescribed by SEC. 

Conclusion 

SEC’s objective under the Proposed Rules is to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for the digital assets market in Nigeria. Notably, the framework extends beyond the regulation of intermediaries engaged in the trading of digital assets to also encompass digital asset issuers and other relevant participants in the digital asset’s ecosystem. 

If implemented, the Proposed Rules will have significant implications for foreign entities seeking to issue digital assets in the Nigerian market. Such entities may be required to comply with requirements relating to the incorporation of a domestic entity where the parent company is incorporated outside Nigeria, as well as requirements concerning the residency of principal officers in Nigeria.

TAXATION OF VIRTUAL ASSETS IN NIGERIA

/in /by

SEUN TIMI-KOLEOLU & PROMISE ITAH

Introduction

On July 31, 2026, the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) issued the Guidelines on the Taxation of Virtual Assets (the “Guidelines”), providing the first comprehensive administrative framework for the taxation of virtual asset transactions in Nigeria.

While the Guidelines do not introduce new taxes, they clarify how existing tax laws apply to virtual assets and establish new compliance obligations for taxpayers, Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) and certain peer-to-peer (P2P) marketplace operators.

This newsletter highlights the key provisions of the Guidelines and their implications for businesses operating within Nigeria’s digital asset ecosystem.

  1. Who and What Are Covered by the Guidelines?

The Guidelines apply to persons and entities who acquire, dispose of, exchange or otherwise deal in virtual assets; receive income or payments in virtual assets; operate as VASPs or P2P marketplace operators; derive taxable income, profits or gains from virtual assets; or provide virtual asset-related services. They cover a broad range of activities, including cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), tokenised assets, DeFi transactions, staking, mining, airdrops and token swaps.

  1. What transactions are taxable?

A tax liability generally arises where a virtual asset is disposed of or income is earned from a virtual asset activity. Common taxable transactions include:

  • selling a virtual asset;
  • exchanging one virtual asset for another;
  • receiving staking or mining rewards;
  • earning rewards from DeFi activities;
  • selling NFTs;
  • receiving virtual assets as payment for goods or services; and
  • other transactions that result in taxable income or gains.

Depending on the nature of the transaction, the applicable taxes may include income tax, withholding tax, value added tax (VAT) and stamp duty.

  1. What transactions are not taxable?

The Guidelines clarify that not every transaction involving a virtual asset gives rise to a tax liability. Generally, the following are not treated as taxable events:

  • holding a virtual asset without disposing of it;
  • transferring virtual assets between wallets owned by the same person;
  • locking up virtual assets for staking;
  • creating or minting NFTs;
  • tokenising real-world asset without a change in beneficial ownership; and
  • using virtual assets as collateral for a loan.

The Guidelines also clarify that the transfer of a virtual asset is generally not subject to VAT. Instead, VAT applies to taxable services provided by VASPs, such as exchange, brokerage and transaction facilitation services. In addition, the Guidelines do not apply to the eNaira or other Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs).

  1. How Are Taxable Gains Computed?

The Guidelines introduce a new method for calculating gains from the disposal of virtual assets. Under this method, the purchase price and sale price are first converted into United States Dollars (USD) using the applicable exchange rates on the dates the asset was acquired and sold. The gain is then calculated in USD before being converted back into naira for tax purposes.

This approach is designed to ensure that taxpayers are taxed on their actual investment gains rather than gains arising solely from changes in the exchange rate.

  1. How Will Virtual Asset Taxes Be Collected?

The Guidelines establish a structured framework for collecting taxes on virtual asset transactions, with responsibility shared between taxpayers and intermediaries such as VASPs and P2P marketplace operators. While taxpayers remain responsible for filing their annual tax returns and paying any outstanding tax, these intermediaries are required to deduct and remit certain taxes on behalf of users where applicable. The Guidelines also clarify that income earned from virtual asset activities, such as staking rewards, mining rewards, DeFi yields and virtual assets received as payment for goods or services, is generally taxable when received.

  1. What Does Token-Native Tax Remittance Mean?

The Guidelines introduce a token-native tax remittance framework. Under this framework, withholding tax on qualifying virtual asset disposals and stamp duty are deducted and remitted in the same virtual asset used in the transaction, rather than first being converted into naira.

To support this framework, the NRS intends to establish a Token Treasury, which will initially accept only supported virtual assets from participating registered VASPs. Where a transaction involves an unsupported virtual asset, the Guidelines provide that it will be converted into a supported token without affecting the taxpayer’s withholding tax credit.

  1. How Should Virtual Assets Be Valued?

The Guidelines establish valuation rules to ensure that virtual assets are valued consistently for tax purposes. Where a virtual asset is not directly priced in USD, taxpayers must use approved valuation sources to determine its fair market value and retain records to support their tax calculations. The Guidelines also prescribe how the cost of a virtual asset should be determined depending on how it was acquired, whether through a purchase, token swap, staking or mining rewards, a hard fork (where a blockchain splits and creates new tokens), or an airdrop (where free tokens are distributed by a project).

Where a taxpayer holds multiple units of the same virtual asset acquired at different times or prices, the Guidelines require a consistent method for determining the cost of the units disposed of. The default method is First-In, First-Out (FIFO), which assumes that the earliest acquired units are sold first, or the Weighted Average Cost method, which uses the average cost of all units held to calculate gains or losses. Once a method is adopted, it must be applied consistently.

Taxpayers may offset virtual asset gains and losses within the same tax year, but losses can only be applied against virtual asset gains and cannot be used to reduce other income.

  1. What Are the Key Compliance Requirements and Penalties?

The Guidelines impose extensive compliance obligations on taxpayers, VASPs and certain P2P marketplace operators. Among other things, taxpayers engaging in virtual asset activities must register for tax purposes and obtain a Tax Identification Number (TIN), while VASPs are required to verify users’ TINs, maintain prescribed records, file statutory returns and comply with the reporting requirements under the Nigeria Tax Administration Act (NTAA).

Failure to comply with these obligations may result in significant penalties including administrative penalties imposed by the NRS.

Key Takeaways for Businesses

The Guidelines provide greater certainty on the taxation of virtual assets but also introduce significant compliance obligations. Businesses should therefore:

  • review how their virtual asset transactions are treated under the Guidelines;
  • ensure their accounting and tax systems can support the new valuation and reporting requirements;
  • maintain comprehensive transaction, valuation and exchange-rate records;
  • review arrangements with VASPs and other intermediaries to understand how tax compliance obligations will be managed; and
  • monitor further guidance from the NRS as the new framework is implemented.

Conclusion

The Guidelines mark a significant step in the development of Nigeria’s virtual asset tax framework by providing much-needed clarity on the taxation of digital asset transactions and the compliance obligations of taxpayers and intermediaries. While this newsletter highlights some of the key provisions of the Guidelines, it is not intended to be an exhaustive analysis of the framework.

Businesses involved in virtual asset activities should review their systems, governance and compliance processes to ensure they are prepared to meet the new reporting, withholding and record-keeping requirements and seek appropriate advice where necessary.

NIGERIA’S FINANCIAL MARKETS REFORM – THE VIRTUAL ASSETS COORDINATION EXECUTIVE ORDER 2026 AND SEC’S PROPOSED CROSS-BORDER TRADING RULES

/in , /by

BY SEUN TIMI-KOLEOLU & ENIOLA SOGBESAN

Introduction

Nigeria continues to take significant steps towards modernizing its financial markets by creating a more transparent, innovative and globally competitive investment ecosystem. Two recent developments reflect this direction: the Presidential Executive Order on Virtual Assets Coordination 2026 (the “Executive Order”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Proposed Rules on Cross-Border Securities Trading and Custody (the “Proposed Rules”). Although they address different segments of the financial market, both initiatives are aimed at strengthening Nigeria’s regulatory framework, inter-agency coordination, and supporting responsible innovation.

In this newsletter, we examine the key highlights of these developments and their implications for investors, capital market operators, fintech companies and other stakeholders. We also consider how these reforms fit into Nigeria’s broader efforts to align its financial/capital markets with international best practices while encouraging growth, protecting investors and enhancing regulatory coordination.

  1. The Presidential Executive Order on Virtual Assets Coordination 2026
    President Bola Ahmed Tinubu on July 17, 2026 signed the Presidential Executive Order on Virtual Assets Coordination, 2026 (the “Executive Order”). The Order which takes effect immediately, is a response to a largely fragmented regulatory landscape that has exposed Nigerians to unchecked losses from unregulated operators. The Executive Order aims to protect investors while promoting responsible innovation and preserving financial system integrity.Key Highlights of the Executive OrderIt is important to note that the Executive Order does not establish a new regulator but rather establishes a mechanism for coordination amongst existing regulators such as SEC, Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS), Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit (NFIU) and Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA). The key highlights of the Executive Order include-
  • the establishment of a Virtual Asset Council (the “Council”) chaired by the CBN Governor, with the Director-General of the SEC and the Chairman of the Nigeria Revenue Service serving as Vice-Chairs;
  • the establishment of a Virtual Asset Office (VAO) to serve as the operational arm and secretariat of the Council;
  • a functional allocation of regulatory responsibilities among regulators –
      1. SEC – regulation of virtual assets that constitute securities and investment products;
      2. CBN – supervision of payment, settlement, custody and other non-security virtual asset activities within its statutory mandate;
      3. NRS – issue a specialized tax policy for the taxation of virtual assets;
      4. NFIU – oversight for AML/CFT compliance
      5. ONSA – coordination of national security and intelligence.
  • the establishment of a dedicated CBN regulatory sandbox for virtual asset and blockchain-based innovation.Implications and Opportunities for Virtual Asset Service ProvidersThe Executive Order signals a more coordinated regulatory framework for virtual assets, with clearer allocation of responsibilities among regulators and stricter oversight of anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CFT) standards. Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) should also monitor opportunities to participate in the CBN’s proposed regulatory sandbox, as well as anticipated tax guidance from the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS). Collectively, these developments are expected to provide greater regulatory certainty for compliant operators while potentially increasing enforcement against operators that do not meet the applicable regulatory requirements.

    As of the date of this newsletter, we note that the official text of the Executive Order has not been publicly released, and we expect it to be released shortly. Once published, a detailed review of its provisions will be necessary to assess its implications for VASP’s and other participants in Nigeria’s digital asset ecosystem.

B. Proposed Rules On Cross-Border Securities Trading and Custody
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on July 2, 2026 published a draft of its “Proposed Rules on Cross-Border Securities Trading and Custody” (the “Proposed Rules”). The Proposed Rules represent a significant step by the SEC towards establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework for Nigerian investors’ wishing to invest in foreign securities. The Proposed Rules seek to regulate the provision of cross-border securities trading services by SEC-registered brokers, while strengthening investor protection, enhancing regulatory oversight, and promoting the integrity of cross-border investment activities.

  1. Scope/Applicability
    The Proposed Rules are applicable to every broker licensed by the SEC that provides Nigerian investors access to foreign securities listed or traded on a foreign securities exchange. More specifically, the Proposed Rules applies to the following services –
    1. trading in foreign securities on behalf of Nigerian investors;
    2. execution of cross-border securities transactions through foreign intermediaries;
    3. custody and safekeeping of foreign securities belonging to Nigerian investors;
    4. maintenance of records of beneficial ownership of foreign securities; and
    5. the protection of investor rights and assets within indirect holding structures.
  1. Licensing Requirements
    Under the Proposed Rules, a broker is prohibited from providing cross-border securities trading services without first obtaining a prior “No Objection” from the SEC.To obtain a No Objection from the SEC, a broker must submit an application which include but not limited to the following documents –
    1. detailed description of the proposed cross-border trading services;
    2. identification of foreign exchanges to which access shall be provided;
    3. details of foreign brokers and custodians to be engaged;
    4. description of custody and settlement arrangements; and
    5. policies governing safeguarding of client assets.

The Proposed Rules clearly prohibit a broker from facilitating foreign securities trading, unless it maintains a minimum net liquid capital of not less than ₦2 billion.

  1. Approval Requirements for Foreign Brokers?
    Prior to engaging in foreign securities transaction through a foreign broker, a Nigerian broker shall ensure that the foreign broker satisfies the following conditions –
    1. the foreign broker must be licensed and supervised by a securities regulator;
    2. it must operate within jurisdictions that are members of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) and whose regulator is a signatory to the IOSCO Multilateral Memorandum of Understanding or any other cooperation arrangement with the SEC;
    3. it must maintain adequate financial resources, operational capacity, custody safeguards, and client asset protection mechanisms;
    4. where applicable, it is a participant in recognized clearing and settlement systems; and
    5. the foreign broker is not subject to any material regulatory sanction, restrictions, suspension, or enforcement action that may impair its operations or expose investors to undue risk.
  1. Regulatory Assessment and Recognition of Foreign Brokers
    Under the Proposed Rules, a broker shall not enter any arrangement or any other business relationship with a foreign broker for the purpose of providing cross-border securities trading without the prior approval or a “No Objection” of the SEC.An application for approval to engage a foreign broker shall be accompanied by the following:
    1. the proposed agreement between the foreign and Nigerian broker;
    2. details of the services to be provided by the foreign broker;
    3. details of custody, clearing, settlement, and operational arrangements;
    4. evidence of the foreign broker’s licensing and regulatory authorization status;
    5. a status report, letter of good standing, or fit and proper confirmation issued by the foreign broker’s regulator and
    6. such other information as the SEC may require.
  1. Investor Protection
    The Proposed Rules require every foreign security purchased on behalf of a Nigerian investor to be held by a regulated foreign custodian or clearing participant. Also, all securities purchased by an investor must be segregated from the assets of the broker or custodian.Under the Proposed Rules, every broker is required to ensure that –
    1. proper books and records are maintained to clearly distinguish the assets of each investor from the assets of the broker;
    2. no investor asset is utilized for the benefit of the broker or any other investor without the prior written authorization of the affected investor client and the approval of the SEC, where applicable; and
    3. adequate systems and controls are established to ensure the continuous protection, reconciliation, and traceability of client assets.
  1. What are the reporting obligations of Brokers under the Proposed Rules?The Proposed Rules require a broker to submit quarterly reports to the SEC. The details of the report shall include the following –

      1. aggregate value of foreign securities held by Nigerian investors;
      2. custody locations of such securities; and
      3. reconciliation statements.
  2. Fees and Sanctions.The SEC shall be entitled to a fee 0.35% on the purchase of every foreign security by a Nigerian investor and this fee may be reviewed by the SEC from time to time. Upon collecting the fee, the Broker shall submit monthly transaction returns and fee remittance reports to the SEC in the form and manner prescribed by the SEC including reconciliations of transactions executed through foreign intermediaries.Where a broker fails to comply with the Proposed Rules, such broker shall be subject to sanctions such as suspension, monetary penalties, revocation of registration and any other sanction that the SEC may impose.

    Conclusion

    The Virtual Assets Coordination Executive Order 2026 and SEC’s Proposed Rules on Cross-Border Trading of Foreign Securities and Custody, represent important milestones in Nigeria’s efforts to strengthen the regulatory architecture of its financial markets. While the Proposed Rules is still in its draft form, it seeks to provide a structured framework for access to foreign securities, and the Executive Order enhances regulatory coordination for virtual assets. Together, these developments reflect a broader policy objective of positioning Nigeria’s financial markets to support innovation while aligning with international regulatory standards.

VIRTUAL ASSET SERVICE PROVIDER (VASP) LICENCES IN KENYA & NIGERIA – WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW

/in , /by

By Seun Timi-Koleolu, Ombo Malumbe,  Eniola Sogbesan and Faith Ngarama 

 

Introduction

The future of Africa’s digital asset market is no longer speculative. It is real, growing, and increasingly regulated. For founders, Fintechs, and even traditional financial institutions looking to operate in the digital currency space, obtaining a Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) license is the price of market entry. In jurisdictions like Nigeria and Kenya—two of the continent’s most active crypto markets—regulators are moving to formalize the ecosystem, protect consumers, and bring operators within a defined legal framework.

However, while both countries are moving in the same direction, their regulatory approaches, licensing processes, and compliance expectations differ in important ways. Understanding these nuances is critical for any business looking to establish or expand operations across either market.

In this newsletter, we examine the licensing requirements, regulated activities, applicable regulatory authorities and other practical considerations for navigating the process successfully.

S/N SUBJECT NIGERIA KENYA
1 Principal Regulator Securities and Exchange Commission Central Bank of Kenya, and Capital Markets Authority
2 License Categories ·       Ancillary Assets Service Providers (AVASPs)

·       Digital Assets Offering Platform (DAOP)

·       Digital Assets Intermediary (DAI)

·       Digital Assets Platform Operator

·       Real-world Assets Tokenization and Offering Platform

·       Digital Assets Exchange (DAX)

·       Digital Assets Custodian

 ·       Virtual Asset Wallet Provider

·       Virtual Asset Exchange

·       Virtual Asset Payment Processor

·       Virtual Asset Broker

·       Virtual Assets Investment Advisor

·       Virtual Asset Manager

·       Virtual Asset Offering Provider (Initial Coin Offering)

·       Virtual Asset Offering Provider (Virtual Asset Tokenization)

·       Virtual Asset Offering Provider (Token Issuance)

·       Virtual Asset Offering Provider (Stablecoin Issuance)

 

3 Permissible Activities Digital Assets Offering Platform This license is used to facilitate fund raising through a digital asset offering via the use of a distributed ledger technology. Virtual Asset Wallet Provider: Services provided by a third party, in which the private keys to the subject’s virtual assets are held and managed by the third party for proof of ownership and facilitation of transactions.

Virtual Asset Exchange: Providing a digital online platform facilitating virtual asset transfers and exchanges. Exchanges may occur between one or more forms of virtual assets, or between virtual assets and fiat currency; or A platform providing for the facilitation of the sale, trading, or exchange of virtual assets for fiat currencies or for other virtual assets.

Virtual Asset Payment Processor: Arranging transactions involving virtual assets and fiat currency, or between virtual assets.

Virtual Asset Broker: Facilitate the exchange between one or more forms of virtual assets through a virtual asset exchange and virtual asset wallet providers for and on behalf of clients, which may include retail, institutional investors, or funds.

Virtual Assets Investment Advisor: Provision of investment advice on virtual assets, initial virtual asset offering and non-fungible tokens for and on behalf of clients, which may include individuals or institutional investors.

Virtual Asset Manager: Managing portfolios in accordance with mandates given by clients on a discretionary basis where such portfolios include one; or more virtual assets.

Virtual Asset Offering Provider (Initial Coin Offering): Issuing and selling virtual assets to the public. May involve participating in and providing financial services relating to the initial coin offering.

Virtual Asset Offering Provider (Virtual Asset Tokenization): The process of converting real-world assets (like real estate, art, or, commodities) into digital token on a blockchain.

Virtual Asset Offering Provider (Token Issuance): Provision of tokenization platform for issuance and secondary trading of tokens of real-world assets.

Virtual Asset Offering Provider (Stablecoin Issuance): The process of creating and managing approved stablecoins.
Digital Assets Intermediary

This license is used to facilitate transactions involving virtual assets such as:

a. execution of orders for virtual assets on behalf of clients;

b. acceptance and transmission of orders for virtual assets on behalf of clients;

c. placing of virtual assets;

d. providing advice on virtual assets investment;

e. providing financial portfolio.
Digital Assets Custodian

This license is suitable for facilitating the safekeeping/holding in custody and/or administration of virtual assets or instruments that enable control over virtual assets.
Digital Assets Exchange

This license is used to facilitate the trading of virtual or digital assets.
The creation of new license categories such as

·       Ancillary Virtual Asset Service Providers (AVASPs)

·       Digital Assets Platform Operators (DAPOs); and

·       Real‑World Assets Tokenization and Offering Platforms (RATOPs).

highlights an area where further regulatory clarity will be required. As there is no existing regulatory framework that expressly identifies the permissible activities that fall within these newly introduced license categories.
4 Share Capital Requirements Ancillary Assets Service Providers (N300 million)

Digital Assets Offering Platform

(N 1billion)

 

Digital Assets Intermediary

(N500 million)

 

Digital Assets Platform Operator

(N500 million)

 

Real-world Assets Tokenization and Offering Platform

(N 1 billion)

 

Digital Assets Exchange

(N 2 billion)

 

Digital Assets Custodian

(N2 billion)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Virtual Asset Wallet Provider

(KSH 150 million)

 

Virtual Asset Exchange

(KSH 150 million)

 

Virtual Asset Payment Processor

(KSH 50 million)

 

Virtual Asset Broker

(KSH 30 million)

 

Virtual Assets Investment Advisor

(KSH 2.5 million)

 

Virtual Asset Manager

(KSH 30 million)

 

Virtual Asset Offering Provider (Initial Coin Offering)

(KSH 200 million)

 

Virtual Asset Offering Provider (Virtual Asset Tokenization)

(KSH 200 million)

 

Virtual Asset Offering Provider (Token Issuance)

(KSH 200 million)

 

Virtual Asset Offering Provider (Stablecoin Issuance)

(KSH 500 million)
5 Corporate

Governance

Requirements

 All VASPs must have a minimum of five (5) directors, three (3) of whom must be Nigerian.

Also, the board of each VASP must comprise of the following committees

·       Nomination and Governance

·       Remuneration

·       Audit and Risk Management

 The Board of Directors will constitute at least three (3) members.

 

Structure:

·       1/3 must be independent directors.

·       Not more than 1/3 shall be related to any director.

·       The Board’s chairperson shall not be appointed as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO).
6 Investment Thresholds High Networth Individuals

(No restriction)

 

Angel Investors

(maximum of N50 million per issuer within a 12-month period)

 

Retail Investors

(maximum of N1million per issuer not exceeding N10 million within a 12-month period)

 There are yet to be any restrictions on Investment Thresholds. However, this does not limit such limits being applied as per the applicable laws more so from the Capital Markets Authority’s side.

 Conclusion

Securing a Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) license in Nigeria or Kenya is no longer simply a regulatory requirement but a strategic step toward building a credible and sustainable digital asset business. While both jurisdictions are actively developing their frameworks, they each present distinct requirements and regulatory expectations that must be carefully navigated. Businesses looking to operate in either market must take a proactive approach to compliance, ensuring that their structures, governance, and operational models align with the applicable rules from the outset.

Ultimately, success in this space will depend not only on obtaining a VASP license, but on maintaining ongoing compliance in an evolving regulatory environment. As regulators continue to refine their approach to Virtual assets, businesses that prioritize transparency, strong internal controls, and regulatory engagement will be best positioned to scale confidently. For prospective entrants, understanding the regulatory landscape early and preparing accordingly will make the difference between a smooth market entry or costly delays.